Jump to content

Talk:Yerba mate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Argentina is now largest producer

[edit]

Currently Argentina is the world's largest producer of yerba mate, surpassing its neighbors Brazil and Paraguay.

https://yerbamateargentina.org.ar/es/el-mate-en-el-mundo.html... --201.139.81.229 (talk) 14:39, 29 October 2021 (UTC)]][reply]

Images are too centered on Southern South America consumption habits

[edit]

Iced mate is widely consumed in Rio de Janeiro, and the industrial version has been purchased by Coca Cola. It's not a minor fact.

"Caffeine / Mateine" citation needs a better reference

[edit]

Right now, the citation is to an incidental reference in a random journal article from "Medical Problems in Dentistry".

It might be correct, but that's not very strong supporting evidence. Matthew Miller (talk) 23:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]

I agree with Skywatcher68. This is likely a good review to add. Invasive Spices (talk) 16:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources that may not be reliable

[edit]

There is a 2011 template indicating some sources may not be reliable. Those who know please indicate whose those are so we can improve the article. Pumallku (talk) 06:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak, non-MEDRS sources on weight loss

[edit]

This revert was justified because the caffeine content review doesn't address weight loss and the other source is unreliable primary research having used only 14 subjects. WP:MEDRS sources would be needed for the proposed content, as the edit summary stated. Zefr (talk) 06:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was not justified, at most a mild rewording could be done. Per WP:MEDRS itself states "Ideal sources for biomedical information include: review articles (especially systematic reviews) published in reputable medical journals" which the journals Nutrients and Journal of Food Science pass, also the Lutomski, P., Gozdziewska, M., & Florek-Luszczki, M. (2020). Health properties of yerba mate. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 27(2). confirms health benefits . Pumallku (talk) 07:10, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nutrients is an MDPI journal suspected of predatory publishing, and is not reliable for medical content; the report was also primary research with a poor experimental design (n=14). The Journal of Food Science and Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine are obviously not reliable sources for medical content or health effects. Zefr (talk) 07:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]